Sturgeon blasts decision to refer Holyrood expenses to UK supreme court

Nicola Sturgeon has condemned the UK government’s choice to refer two expenses passed by Holyrood all to the supreme court as “morally repugnant” amidst an outcry from MSPs.

The Scottish parliament passed the United Nations convention on the rights of the child costs and the European charter of local self-government bill in the weeks prior to it entered into recess.

Alister Jack, the Scottish secretary in Boris Johnson’s cabinet, had requested modifications be made to the children’s bill, which intends to guarantee Scottish public authorities comply with the rights laid out in the charter, prior to it was passed. No modifications were made before it moved through Holyrood.

The UK federal government stated it referred that bill and the local government bill to the supreme court due to concerns that technical aspects of both pieces of legislation might enforce legal duties on UK ministers.

A representative said: “UK public law officers have today referred 2 costs from the Scottish parliament to the supreme court under section 33 of the Scotland Act 1998. [Their] issues are not about the compound of the legislation, rather whether parts are outwith the legal skills of the Scottish parliament.”

The move has actually led to anger amongst MSPs, with the first minister leading the charge versus the government choice.

In a tweet branding the action “jaw-dropping”, Sturgeon wrote: “The UK Tory government is going to court to challenge a law gone by scotparl all. And for what? To protect their capability to legislate/act in manner ins which breach kids’s rights in Scotland. Politically devastating, however also ethically repugnant.”

John Swinney, deputy first minister of Scotland, last month hailed the children’s bill as “a revolution in children’s rights” and a “major cause for event”.

He implicated Westminster of wishing to breach children’s rights by referring the bill to the supreme court. He said the unopposed expense had actually been “licensed independently by the administering officer as being within the powers of the Scottish parliament”.

The deputy first minister added: “Now the Tory Westminster government is trying to veto those rights. That is not simply ethically repugnant, but it is likewise deeply menacing.”

He pledged to combat the challenge, stating that only those “who wish to breach kids’s rights” need “fear this costs”.

The Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar, signed up with the SNP in its attack on the choice, identifying the Conservatives as “bereft of empathy” and having “entirely lost their method”, though he likewise took a swipe at Labour’s competitors by saying that Scotland “should have a better opposition” in a time of national crisis.

Please follow and like us:

Check Also

Risks sent to race equality group after criticism by Tory MPs

When an equality thinktank with simply 8 full-time personnel included its voice to criticism of …