SC remains arrest of Shashi Tharoor, others for tweets on farmer Navreet

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed the arrest of Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and reporters Rajdeep Sardesai, Mrinal Pande, Zafar Agha, Vinod Jose, Aman Nath and Paresh Nath over their controversial tweets on the death of Navreet Singh during the Republic Day tractor rally. Remain on the arrests was given after Lawyer General Tushar Mehta, representing the Delhi Cops, refused to assure that they would not be jailed till the court chose their pleas to quash the FIRs.The petitioners had actually tweeted right away after Navreet Singh died that he was shot dead, an accusation denied by the Delhi Police. It claimed that Singh was killed when his tractor reversed after he attempted to break through the cops cordon formed to prevent the tractor rally from advancing.The petitioners argued that the FIRs were orchestrated to smother complimentary speech and it was an attack on their individual liberty and looked for quashing of FIRs on the ground that no prima facie case was constructed. Acting on their pleas, a bench led by Chief Justice of India SA Bobde remained their arrest. The bench was initially inclined to approve interim security and showed so to petitioners counsel Kapil Sibal and Rebecca John. “Absolutely nothing is going to take place,” CJI Bobde observed when Sibal insisted that the bench secure the petitioners. “Where is the danger?” the CJI asked. Sibal and John were helped by senior partners Nandini Gore and Sandeep Kapur of Karanjawala & Co.Mehta would just state, “we understand our responsibilities.” However when the CJI later demanded an indisputable statement on whether the prosecuting agencies would apprehend any of them, he did not say anything. “Are you going to apprehend?” the CJI asked Mehta. “If you can’t make such a declaration, we will remain their arrest,” the CJI stated. Mehta opposed the stay of arrest on the ground that their tweets have actually had a “horrendous result” as they have a “big following”. The CJI rejected his opposition and issued notices to various states where FIRs have been filed. The notification will have to be responded to in two weeks. The court will then examine the pleas of the petitioners for quashing of their FIRs. Multiple FIRs were submitted against the Congress leader and the journalists across the nation conjuring up charges of sedition, injuring religious sentiments, developing enmity between various sections and criminal conspiracy, triggering them to move the leading court for quashing of these FIRs.In his petition Sardesai argued that the right to free speech and expression was among the most significant rights ensured by the Constitution and promoting it is at the heart of our democracy.To criminally prosecute for sedition a reporter who was faithfully reporting what he was being told on the ground of a developing circumstance and making sure to make sure that any mistakes are instantly fixed would trigger irrevocable damage to flexibility of speech and the cause of democracy, he said.If this harassment is permitted to stand, it will entirely destroy any notion of journalistic freedom and foster a circumstance where complimentary reporting of news is an impossibility. He declared that the several FIRs being submitted against him on the basis of the very same truths were an orchestrated effort to smother his right to complimentary speech and an attack on his individual liberty.It was also an effort to muzzle journalism and would have significant implications for the journalistic community as a whole, he said.He argued that he was reporting a developing circumstance and withdrew the tweets within 22 minutes after the cops contested this variation. His tweets were simple accusations and not confirmed facts and he had made that clear in his tweets, Sardesai contended.Despite efforts made by him to diligently report the unfolding occasions in an impartial discharge of his journalistic responsibilities, a series of pointless and malicious FIRs have actually been filed across the countries, he contended. A minimum of 12 such FIRs have been signed up in different parts.The variety of FIRs, the timing, the selection of accused and the language recommend an “orchestrated effort” to misuse the process to target people and spread worry, it said.In any case, such a tweet which was later on eliminated as fresh facts came to light unrelated to caste, creed, religious beliefs, communities can not be the basis of conjuring up charges such as sedition, harming spiritual beliefs and the like.Lodging of these FIRs was itself a conspiracy to wrongly link the petitioners and look for to prosecute them for offences which can not be made out on a prima facie reading of the FIR.Some areas which have absolutely nothing to do with the allegations made in the FIR had been maliciously inserted to bug the petitioners and bias their case to scuttle their ability to get bail, it stated.

Please follow and like us:

Check Also

Jitendra Singh gets in touch with Assam Guv, apprises him of continuous

Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) Development of North Eastern Region (DoNER), Dr Jitendra Singh …