Exclusive: legal representatives provide two weeks discover that unless a questions is released they will take the federal government to court
Families dispossessed by Covid-19 have actually alerted Downing Street they will begin legal action against the federal government after Easter unless Boris Johnson urgently introduces a statutory public query into the government’s handling of the pandemic.
Attorneys for 25 bereaved spouses and children on Wednesday provided Downing Street 2 weeks see that without a dedication they will go to court to claim ministers are breaking the law by not launching a questions now.
Nearly a year since the very first lockdown and with a mortality rate worse than any other major economy, the warning shows the rising anger felt amongst some of the bereaved that their calls for a public query, initially made in June, have not been followed, despite the prime minister pledging an “independent inquiry” 8 months earlier.
The legal threat was sent on Wednesday lunch break by attorneys acting for the Covid-19 Bereaved Households for Justice group which has over 2,800 members. Its agents, Elkan Abrahamson and Pete Weatherby QC have acted in major public questions including into the Hillsborough, Grenfell Tower and Manchester Arena catastrophes.
‘It was avoidable’: families dispossessed in 2nd wave require Covid query
Find out more
” With many of us approaching the anniversary of our enjoyed one’s passing, believe me we ‘d rather be with our families than standing in court,” said Jo Goodman, co-founder of the group and who lost her 72-year-old father, Stuart, to the virus. “But if this government will not listen and act, then that’s where they’ll be seeing us.”
The move contributes to mounting pressure on ministers after government clinical consultants, a former head of the civil service and physicians and nurses leaders backed an inquiry. Ballot for the Guardian has actually meanwhile discovered that 47% of the UK population wants a statutory public questions which would take evidence under oath, compared to just 18% who oppose the idea.
The key issues individuals polled by ICM want examined are the federal government’s preparedness prior to the pandemic hit, the control of movement through the UK’s borders and the timing of lockdowns.
At prime minister’s questions Boris Johnson again declined to state when a query would begin or whether it would be set up with powers to subpoena witnesses and proof, telling parliament instead: “There will be time for a complete questions to enable all of us to understand what we need to do better when we face these issues in the future.”
Asked about the bereaved’s demand Downing Street said “now is not the right time to dedicate big amounts of official time to a query”.
At a press instruction on Wednesday afternoon, Matt Hancock, the health secretary, avoided describing why he believed a query was not needed in the near future, just assuring that “we’re discovering lessons all the time”.
Prof Jonathan Van-Tam, England’s deputy chief medical officer, said any query now would an “unwelcome diversion for me personally at the moment when I’m extremely focused on the vaccine programme.”
Earlier on Wednesday, the prime minister’s former chief of personnel, Dominic Cummings, informed a Commons committee there required to be “a really, really tough appearance” at what went wrong in the action to Covid. He stated the Department of Health and Social Care was like “a smoking mess up” early in the pandemic which meant Downing Street decided to eliminate the vaccine program from its control.
Labour likewise advised the government to start preparations for a public inquiry now with proceedings to begin in earnest from 21 June when the nation is because of lastly emerge from lockdown.
The Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice Group’s eight-page letter prior to claim sent to the prime minister and Hancock requires the launch of a judge-led public questions “without further delay”.
” It is tough to consider any matter that has emerged since the enactment of the 2005 Inquiries Act which is so suitable for investigation,” it stated.
Arguing that with the vaccination program well under method and transmission rates falling, there is no excuse for not introducing an inquiry now, they asked: “Why have the repercussions for an island nation, amongst the most affluent on the planet, with an extremely operating health service, been so strikingly even worse than in other countries?”
The bereaved claim an investigation is needed to satisfy the UK’s tasks under the European convention on human rights in cases when it is arguable that measures to prevent danger to life and health were not taken.
The letter states: “The dispossessed are entitled to an official investigation into the deaths of their enjoyed ones, in which they can successfully take part, to determine an accurate narrative regarding what happened, to ease rumours and frauds, to figure out the policy decisions that were effective and those that were inefficient, and to seek to avoid future comparable deaths.”
It adds: “Given that it is more than a year since the emergence of the virus, and a year given that some of the plaintiffs lost liked ones, delay in instituting a questions will cause loss of important proof by destruction and removal of records and fading of memories.”
They stated the inquiry could focus on England with comparable procedures set up in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland with a joined up technique to typical questions and locations of evidence.
Abrahamson stated: “This is an absolute last ditch effort to prevent pricey and unnecessary legal procedures and a direct plea to the federal government to devote to a timely statutory public inquiry. With this step that the Covid-19 Bereaved Households for Justice have actually had to take, it’s with the federal government to see sense and do the ideal thing.”