Battleground states prompt Supreme Court to reject Texas’ quote to

U.S. President Donald Trump gestures after talking at a Double Eagle Energy Holdings LLC oil rig in Midland, Texas, on Wednesday, July 29, 2020.

The battleground states whose presidential election outcomes are being challenged by Texas at the Supreme Court urged the justices on Thursday not to use up the case.

The four states targeted in the lawsuit alerted in uncharacteristically sharp briefs that approving Texas’ extraordinary demand would “do violence to the Constitution” and “disenfranchise millions” of citizens.

Those states– Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia– have all certified their election results, with Democrat Joe Biden defeating President Donald Trump.

Pennsylvania in its short called Texas Attorney general of the United States Ken Paxton’s long-shot bid to overturn other states’ elections “legally indefensible” and “an affront to concepts of constitutional democracy.”

” Texas seeks to revoke elections in 4 states for yielding outcomes with which it disagrees,” Pennsylvania’s scathing quick read.

Dana Nessel, the attorney general of the United States of Michigan, told the court in her state’s brief to reject Texas’ case outright.

” To do otherwise would make this Court the arbiter of all future nationwide elections,” Nessel wrote.

” The base of Texas’s claims rests on an assertion that Michigan has actually broken its own election laws. Not true,” Nessel added. “That claim has actually been declined in the federal and state courts in Michigan, and simply the other day the Michigan Supreme Court turned down a last-ditch effort to request an audit.”

Christopher Carr, the chief law officer of Georgia, told the court that Texas was seeking to “move Georgia’s electoral powers to the federal judiciary.”

“Respect for federalism and the constitutional design prohibits that transfer of power, however this Court ought to never ever even reach that issue,” he wrote.

The replies came one day after Trump asked the high court to let him intervene in the event. The president, who is refusing to concede to Biden, has hyped Texas’ case as “the huge one”– but election law specialists say there’s little if any chance the court will allow it to proceed.

So far, the justices have not taken any action in the case. Regardless of Trump’s regular pleas, the court has actually not shown an eagerness to get involved in any lawsuits associated to the presidential election.

For instance, the justices have not yet said whether they will hear a GOP challenge to absentee tallies received after Election Day in Pennsylvania. On Tuesday, they turned back an appeal from a Trump ally seeking to overturn the results in that state in a one-line order with no kept in mind dissents.

Still, Paxton’s case has actually fueled hopes amongst Trump’s fans who are desperate for a sweeping court order to cancel Biden’s forecasted success. Big swaths of voters are encouraged by the president’s duplicated claims, unproven and often exposed, that widespread electoral fraud tipped the election to Biden.

Seventeen states that Trump won in the popular vote further fueled those views Wednesday, when they filed a quick to the Supreme Court in assistance of Texas’ case.

Trump and his project legal group have lodged dozens of claims in lower courts seeking to void election results and have state legislatures select pro-Trump electors.

Many of those cases have actually currently been dismissed– but Trump is still pursuing legal challenges in crucial states, even with less than a week remaining before electors meet to cast their votes.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Please follow and like us:

Check Also

Op ed: Here’s how we kept Georgia open for business

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp speaks as his partner Marty Kemp looks on during a run-off …

RSS
LinkedIn
Share